Design

The boring industry didn't kill his art. It built it.

The father of Op Art spent his 20s and 30s drawing ads. A lot of them for pharma.

Victor Vasarely. The optical illusions, the Renault logo, the MoMA exhibitions. Before all of it - a commercial artist in Paris, working across the industries nobody calls glamorous. Pharma was one of them. The ads I'm showing here are the pharma ones.

Four French pharmaceutical advertising posters by Victor Vasarely, arranged in a 2x2 grid. Top left: Strychnal, a glowing red bottle of pills under a spray of glass pipettes against a dark teal background. Top right: Ampho-Vaccin, bold red text on a pink silhouette of a torso, over rows of stylized intestinal microbes. Bottom left: Douleurs, a seated turbaned figure holding his head, resting on a bed of nails. Bottom right: Basedowine, red and white text overlaid on the ghostly outline of a dancer's body against a red background.
Vasarely's pharmaceutical ads for French doctors, 1930s.

I found this while researching 1930s French pharma design and I can't stop thinking about it.

His teacher at Műhely (Budapest's Bauhaus-inspired school) gave him advice every designer should hear: learn to make a living from advertising, so you can devote yourself to your own work.

So at 24 he moved to Paris and worked for advertising agencies on commercial graphics, including pharma inserts and ads. At 29 he partnered with a publisher who specialized in pharmaceutical and medical inserts, and that work ran through his 30s.

(A detail I love: his very first design commission, at around 19, came while he was working as an assistant accountant at a pharmaceutical company in Budapest. Pharma bookends his whole origin story.)

And he didn't treat commercial work as beneath him. He studied it. In 1947 he wrote that a football poster designed to attract a crowd and a pharmaceutical insert addressed to doctors are essentially different problems.

1947, audience-first design. Know who's looking before you draw a single line. We're still teaching this today.

The commercial work gave him an income, a team of assistants, and room to keep running his personal experiments on the side - experiments that would eventually lead toward Op Art. By 1944 he quit advertising and went all in on painting. 20 years later, MoMA.

What I take from this:

  • Commercial work isn't the opposite of art. For Vasarely it was the training ground
  • The “boring” industries produce serious craft. Some of his sharpest early work was medicine ads for doctors
  • Client work teaches you the alphabet. Personal work writes the sentences. You need both

So when someone tells me pharma or insurance is where creativity goes to die - I think about a Hungarian kid in Paris, drawing medicine ads between agency jobs, quietly building the eye that would invent the visual language of the 1960s.

The boring industry didn't kill his art. It built it ¯\(ツ)/¯

See more Norml in Google Search

Add Norml as a preferred source
Share
Zhenia Mohyla
Written by

Zhenia Mohyla

Co-founder · Design & Strategy

I lead design and strategy at Norml, shaping client work, internal systems, and the studio’s creative direction.

LinkedIn ↗