An agreed order of work
Findings are prioritised against affected URLs and dependencies, so the team stops debating which recommendation to do first.
Optional analytics, advertising and case-study videos are off. Allow them all, or open settings to choose. Privacy policy

We review available search evidence and catalogue structure, keeping engineering correctness with the manufacturer’s expert reviewers.
A few clients we’ve worked with




















We review available search evidence and catalogue structure, keeping engineering correctness with the manufacturer’s expert reviewers.
A large catalogue does not automatically provide useful search coverage.
Search conclusions need to distinguish measured facts from unavailable evidence.
Search work needs a starting point. An audit replaces a pile of recommendations with an ordered list of what is actually limiting the site.
Findings are prioritised against affected URLs and dependencies, so the team stops debating which recommendation to do first.
Technical eligibility, content quality, intent and measurement gaps are separated, so a content problem is not treated as a crawl problem.
Existing search assets are recorded before anything changes, which is what keeps a rebuild from quietly costing traffic.
The work uses approved product and capability records. Engineering and commercial owners verify specifications, document revisions and the permitted use of business systems.
Assess authorised reporting and a public crawl.
Check product, family and capability pages for distinct purposes.
Attach evidence and verification methods to recommended changes.
Reviews from the companies we have built and maintained websites for.
Read every review on Clutch“They delivered what they said they would, on time.”
“We didn’t choose them to be impressed — we chose them because we knew they’d deliver high-level results with no risk. As a CTO myself, that’s exactly what I look for in a long-term partnership.”
“And, you know, the great part about the fact that you hit the goal, it's not that you had to compromise anything that you were doing, because, honestly, the end result far exceeded what we could have imagined.”
“I would just say that you deliver on quality … I just thought we clicked, and you delivered what we were looking for.”
The agreed engagement includes the relevant outputs below.
A source-backed audit.
Page-level findings.
A prioritised action plan.
Explore the wider scope behind the website.
Connect search research, technical improvements, page structure, and content planning with your business priorities.
Keep ongoing updates, backups, functional checks, technical support, and website improvements organized.
Measure loading bottlenecks and implement targeted improvements with comparable verification.
Test critical journeys, responsive layouts, content, and integrations with reproducible bug reports.
Explore the scope, deliverables and process for each part of the website.
Our process
Record crawl and reporting coverage and its limitations.
[ 01 ]Review technical defects and overlap among product and capability pages.
[ 02 ]Identify affected URLs, required owners and how each recommendation can be checked.
[ 03 ]No account layer between you and them. These are the Norml specialists this work runs through.

“I've spent 10 years working across development and marketing. I started as a developer, but design, SEO and advertising were already part of the job. That taught me to treat a website as one system: the business, the content, the design and the code have to work together. At Norml, I lead the architecture behind our work and stay involved wherever strategy, design, development and search meet.”
Max TymoshynFounder & Architect
Get started